Skip to content
Screener

BKEM vs EMOP

BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF

BKEM

BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.11%

Fund size

$90M

EMOP

AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF

Annual cost

0.70%

Fund size

$2.2B

Key differences

Both BKEM and EMOP are equity ETFs. BKEM charges 0.11% a year and EMOP 0.70%. The main difference: BKEM follows a index tracking strategy; EMOP uses active selection.

  • BKEM follows a index tracking strategy; EMOP uses active selection.
  • BKEM costs 0.59% less per year.
  • EMOP is much larger than BKEM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BKEMEMOP
Annual cost (TER)0.11%0.70%
Fund size (AUM)$90M$2.2B
Since20201995
Dividend yield1.49%1.50%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+46.5%N/A
CAGR 3Y+22.7%N/A
CAGR 5Y+6.8%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.02N/A
Volatility 1Y21.06%
Max drawdown-39.48%-12.87%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to BKEM and EMOP