Screener
BKLN vs GTO
Invesco Senior Loan ETF vs Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
Key differences
- GTO costs 0.30% less per year.
- BKLN is significantly larger than GTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BKLN follows a index tracking strategy; GTO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BKLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BKLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BKLN | GTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.8B | $2.3B |
| Since | 2011 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 6.91% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.8% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.3% | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.29 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.75% | 3.47% |
| Max drawdown | -24.17% | -20.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BKLN and GTO
Explore further