Screener
GTO vs PFIG
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF vs Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.13% less per year.
- GTO is significantly larger than PFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTO follows a active selection strategy; PFIG uses index tracking.
- PFIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTO | PFIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $113M |
| Since | 2016 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 4.75% | 4.37% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | +1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.47% | 3.10% |
| Max drawdown | -20.75% | -15.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTO and PFIG
Explore further