Screener
BLCR vs CSM
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF vs ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Key differences
- BLCR costs 0.09% less per year.
- BLCR is significantly larger than CSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BLCR is classified as equity, while CSM is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BLCR covers global markets; CSM covers north america.
- BLCR follows a active selection strategy; CSM uses long short.
- CSM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCR | CSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $499M |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.24% | 1.05% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.4% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.61% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -21.29% | -36.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BLCR and CSM
Explore further