Screener
CSM vs ENHU
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus vs iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHU costs 0.23% less per year.
- CSM is significantly larger than ENHU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CSM is classified as alternative, while ENHU is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CSM follows a long short strategy; ENHU uses active selection.
- CSM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CSM | ENHU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $499M | $9M |
| Since | 2009 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.11% | -8.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CSM and ENHU
Explore further