Screener
BLCR vs ECNS
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF vs iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both BLCR and ECNS are equity ETFs. BLCR charges 0.36% a year and ECNS 0.59%. The main difference: BLCR follows a active selection strategy; ECNS uses index tracking.
- BLCR follows a active selection strategy; ECNS uses index tracking.
- BLCR covers global markets; ECNS covers emerging markets.
- BLCR costs 0.23% less per year.
- BLCR is much larger than ECNS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- ECNS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCR | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.0B | $71M |
| Since | 2023 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 6.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.5% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.90% | 21.06% |
| Max drawdown | -21.29% | -63.44% |
Similar to BLCR and ECNS
Explore further