Screener
ECNS vs FXI
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF vs iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Key differences
- ECNS costs 0.14% less per year.
- FXI is significantly larger than ECNS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FXI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ECNS | FXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.73% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $82M | $6.1B |
| Since | 2010 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 6.05% | 2.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.4% | +0.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.7% | +10.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.1% | -2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.87% | 19.74% |
| Max drawdown | -63.44% | -60.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ECNS and FXI
Explore further