Screener
BLCR vs IWL
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.21% less per year.
- BLCR covers global markets; IWL covers north america.
- BLCR follows a active selection strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCR | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.24% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.4% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.61% | 12.34% |
| Max drawdown | -21.29% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BLCR and IWL
Explore further