Screener
BLCR vs IWR
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IWR costs 0.18% less per year.
- IWR is significantly larger than BLCR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BLCR covers global markets; IWR covers north america.
- BLCR follows a active selection strategy; IWR uses index tracking.
- IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCR | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $52.6B |
| Since | 2023 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.24% | 1.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.7% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.68% | 13.52% |
| Max drawdown | -21.29% | -40.59% |
Similar to BLCR and IWR
Explore further