Screener
BLCR vs MMAX
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF vs iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF
Key differences
- BLCR costs 0.14% less per year.
- BLCR is significantly larger than MMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BLCR is classified as equity, while MMAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BLCR covers global markets; MMAX covers north america.
- BLCR follows a active selection strategy; MMAX uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCR | MMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $72M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.24% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.4% | +7.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.61% | 1.46% |
| Max drawdown | -21.29% | -1.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BLCR and MMAX
Explore further