Screener
BLCV vs ISCV
iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF vs iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- ISCV costs 0.40% less per year.
- BLCV follows a active selection strategy; ISCV uses index tracking.
- ISCV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCV | ISCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $317M | $651M |
| Since | 2023 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 1.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.8% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.64% | 16.48% |
| Max drawdown | -13.44% | -51.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BLCV and ISCV
Explore further