Screener
BLCV vs IWN
iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWN costs 0.22% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than BLCV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BLCV follows a active selection strategy; IWN uses index tracking.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLCV | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $317M | $13.4B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.8% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.64% | 17.87% |
| Max drawdown | -13.44% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BLCV and IWN
Explore further