Screener
IWN vs IWX
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWN is significantly larger than IWX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWN | IWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $3.4B |
| Since | 2000 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +11.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.87% | 10.11% |
| Max drawdown | -46.08% | -35.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWN and IWX
Explore further