Screener
BLDG vs GVAL
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF vs Cambria Global Value ETF
Key differences
- BLDG costs 0.07% less per year.
- GVAL is significantly larger than BLDG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GVAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BLDG | GVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $541M |
| Since | 2020 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 5.66% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +38.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +25.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | +13.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.03% | 14.49% |
| Max drawdown | -27.25% | -47.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BLDG and GVAL
Explore further