Screener
BMED vs PINK
iShares Health Innovation Active ETF vs Simplify Health Care ETF
Key differences
- PINK is significantly larger than BMED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BMED follows a active selection strategy; PINK uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PINK has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BMED | PINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.51% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $241M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.7% | +33.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.8% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.16 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.93% | 18.07% |
| Max drawdown | -36.44% | -18.77% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BMED and PINK
Explore further