Screener
PINK vs IXJ
Simplify Health Care ETF vs iShares Global Healthcare ETF
Key differences
- IXJ costs 0.11% less per year.
- IXJ is significantly larger than PINK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PINK has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PINK | IXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.51% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $241M | $3.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 1.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.4% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.04% | 14.46% |
| Max drawdown | -18.77% | -27.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PINK and IXJ
Explore further