Screener
BNDS vs PFFA
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF vs Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
Key differences
- BNDS costs 1.23% less per year.
- PFFA is significantly larger than BNDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BNDS is classified as alternative, while PFFA is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BNDS follows a multi strategy strategy; PFFA uses active selection.
- PFFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BNDS | PFFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 2.11% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 7.93% | 9.57% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.3% | +15.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.60% | 7.07% |
| Max drawdown | -6.95% | -70.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BNDS and PFFA
Explore further