Screener
PFFA vs PGX
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF vs Invesco Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PGX costs 1.61% less per year.
- PFFA follows a active selection strategy; PGX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PFFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PGX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFFA | PGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.11% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $3.9B |
| Since | 2018 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 9.57% | 6.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.0% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.0% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | -0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.07% | 6.14% |
| Max drawdown | -70.52% | -34.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFFA and PGX
Explore further