Screener
BOTZ vs CGGO
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.21% less per year.
- BOTZ follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BOTZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BOTZ | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.4B | $10.1B |
| Since | 2016 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.3% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.09% | 16.59% |
| Max drawdown | -55.54% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BOTZ and CGGO
Explore further