Screener
BOTZ vs CGGR
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGR costs 0.29% less per year.
- CGGR is significantly larger than BOTZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BOTZ follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BOTZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BOTZ | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.4B | $22.2B |
| Since | 2016 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.3% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +26.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.09% | 16.28% |
| Max drawdown | -55.54% | -28.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BOTZ and CGGR
Explore further