Screener
BOXA vs GCOR
Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond vs Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
Both BOXA and GCOR are fixed income ETFs. BOXA charges 0.23% a year and GCOR 0.08%. The main difference: BOXA follows a structured outcome strategy; GCOR uses index tracking.
- BOXA follows a structured outcome strategy; GCOR uses index tracking.
- GCOR costs 0.15% less per year.
- GCOR is much larger than BOXA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BOXA | GCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $822M |
| Since | 2024 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 4.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.4% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.69% | 3.63% |
| Max drawdown | -3.22% | -18.94% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.