Screener
BOXA vs GIGB
Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond vs Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
Both BOXA and GIGB are fixed income ETFs. BOXA charges 0.23% a year and GIGB 0.08%. The main difference: BOXA follows a structured outcome strategy; GIGB uses index tracking.
- BOXA follows a structured outcome strategy; GIGB uses index tracking.
- GIGB costs 0.15% less per year.
- GIGB is much larger than BOXA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GIGB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BOXA | GIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $982M |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 4.61% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.4% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.69% | 4.31% |
| Max drawdown | -3.22% | -22.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.