Screener
BPAY vs ARTY
iShares FinTech Active ETF vs iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
Key differences
- ARTY costs 0.08% less per year.
- ARTY is significantly larger than BPAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BPAY is classified as alternative, while ARTY is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BPAY follows a active selection strategy; ARTY uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ARTY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BPAY | ARTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2022 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.3% | +96.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.4% | +33.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.59% | 29.41% |
| Max drawdown | -33.62% | -54.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BPAY and ARTY
Explore further