Screener
BPAY vs IBLC
iShares FinTech Active ETF vs iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
Key differences
- IBLC costs 0.08% less per year.
- IBLC is significantly larger than BPAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BPAY follows a active selection strategy; IBLC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IBLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BPAY | IBLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $83M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 1.27% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -5.8% | +67.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | +48.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.36 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.59% | 55.35% |
| Max drawdown | -33.62% | -62.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BPAY and IBLC
Explore further