Screener
BPAY vs IHAK
iShares FinTech Active ETF vs iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF
Key differences
- IHAK costs 0.08% less per year.
- IHAK is significantly larger than BPAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BPAY is classified as alternative, while IHAK is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BPAY follows a active selection strategy; IHAK uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IHAK has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BPAY | IHAK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $744M |
| Since | 2022 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 0.09% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.3% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.4% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | 0.64 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.59% | 23.18% |
| Max drawdown | -33.62% | -34.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BPAY and IHAK
Explore further