Screener
BPAY vs IJR
iShares FinTech Active ETF vs iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
BPAY is an alternative ETF, while IJR is an equity ETF. BPAY charges 0.55% a year and IJR 0.06%.
- BPAY is an alternative fund, while IJR is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- BPAY follows a active selection strategy; IJR uses index tracking.
- BPAY covers global markets; IJR covers North America.
- IJR costs 0.49% less per year.
- IJR is much larger than BPAY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IJR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IJR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BPAY | IJR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $103.5B |
| Since | 2022 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 2.79% | 1.15% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -13.7% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.9% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.44% | 17.62% |
| Max drawdown | -33.62% | -44.36% |
Similar to BPAY and IJR
Explore further