Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BPAY vs IWB

iShares FinTech Active ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF

BPAY

iShares FinTech Active ETF

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$9M

IWB

iShares Russell 1000 ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$48.9B

Key differences

BPAY is an alternative ETF, while IWB is an equity ETF. BPAY charges 0.55% a year and IWB 0.15%.

  • BPAY is an alternative fund, while IWB is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • BPAY follows a active selection strategy; IWB uses index tracking.
  • BPAY covers global markets; IWB covers North America.
  • IWB costs 0.40% less per year.
  • IWB is much larger than BPAY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BPAYIWB
Annual cost (TER)0.55%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$9M$48.9B
Since20222000
Dividend yield2.79%0.91%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y-13.7%+24.3%
CAGR 3Y+8.9%+22.2%
CAGR 5YN/A+12.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.331.17
Volatility 1Y26.44%12.22%
Max drawdown-33.62%-34.60%

Similar to BPAY and IWB