Screener
BPAY vs IWB
iShares FinTech Active ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
BPAY is an alternative ETF, while IWB is an equity ETF. BPAY charges 0.55% a year and IWB 0.15%.
- BPAY is an alternative fund, while IWB is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- BPAY follows a active selection strategy; IWB uses index tracking.
- BPAY covers global markets; IWB covers North America.
- IWB costs 0.40% less per year.
- IWB is much larger than BPAY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BPAY | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $48.9B |
| Since | 2022 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 2.79% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -13.7% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.9% | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.44% | 12.22% |
| Max drawdown | -33.62% | -34.60% |
Similar to BPAY and IWB
Explore further