Screener
BPAY vs IWM
iShares FinTech Active ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
BPAY is an alternative ETF, while IWM is an equity ETF. BPAY charges 0.55% a year and IWM 0.19%.
- BPAY is an alternative fund, while IWM is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- BPAY follows a active selection strategy; IWM uses index tracking.
- BPAY covers global markets; IWM covers North America.
- IWM costs 0.36% less per year.
- IWM is much larger than BPAY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BPAY | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $80.9B |
| Since | 2022 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 2.79% | 0.87% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -13.7% | +36.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.9% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.44% | 19.54% |
| Max drawdown | -33.62% | -41.13% |
Similar to BPAY and IWM
Explore further