Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BPAY vs IWM

iShares FinTech Active ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF

BPAY

iShares FinTech Active ETF

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$9M

IWM

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$80.9B

Key differences

BPAY is an alternative ETF, while IWM is an equity ETF. BPAY charges 0.55% a year and IWM 0.19%.

  • BPAY is an alternative fund, while IWM is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • BPAY follows a active selection strategy; IWM uses index tracking.
  • BPAY covers global markets; IWM covers North America.
  • IWM costs 0.36% less per year.
  • IWM is much larger than BPAY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, IWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BPAYIWM
Annual cost (TER)0.55%0.19%
Fund size (AUM)$9M$80.9B
Since20222000
Dividend yield2.79%0.87%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y-13.7%+36.6%
CAGR 3Y+8.9%+18.9%
CAGR 5YN/A+5.8%
Sharpe 3Y0.330.75
Volatility 1Y26.44%19.54%
Max drawdown-33.62%-41.13%

Similar to BPAY and IWM