Screener
BPAY vs RGLO
iShares FinTech Active ETF vs Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
Key differences
- RGLO costs 0.06% less per year.
- RGLO is significantly larger than BPAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BPAY is classified as alternative, while RGLO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BPAY covers global markets; RGLO covers north america.
- BPAY follows a active selection strategy; RGLO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BPAY | RGLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $309M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -5.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.36 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.59% | — |
| Max drawdown | -33.62% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BPAY and RGLO
Explore further