Screener
BPAY vs SPAM
iShares FinTech Active ETF vs Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Key differences
- SPAM costs 0.20% less per year.
- BPAY is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BPAY is classified as alternative, while SPAM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BPAY covers global markets; SPAM covers north america.
- BPAY follows a active selection strategy; SPAM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BPAY | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $2M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 0.48% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.3% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.59% | 25.42% |
| Max drawdown | -33.62% | -24.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BPAY and SPAM
Explore further