Screener
BREM vs EMTL
iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF vs State Street DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- BREM costs 0.15% less per year.
- EMTL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BREM | EMTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $90M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.99% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.22% |
| Max drawdown | -4.54% | -22.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BREM and EMTL
Explore further