Screener
BREM vs EBND
iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF
Key differences
- EBND costs 0.20% less per year.
- EBND is significantly larger than BREM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EBND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BREM | EBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.72% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.93% |
| Max drawdown | -4.54% | -29.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BREM and EBND
Explore further