Screener
BRLN vs PVI
iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF vs Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- PVI costs 0.30% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, BRLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BRLN | PVI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $31M |
| Since | 2022 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 6.51% | 2.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.1% | +2.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.5% | +2.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | -0.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.03% | 2.61% |
| Max drawdown | -3.85% | -1.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BRLN and PVI
Explore further