Screener
BRLN vs TFLR
iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF vs T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
Key differences
- BRLN costs 0.06% less per year.
- TFLR is significantly larger than BRLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BRLN covers north america markets; TFLR covers global.
- BRLN follows a index tracking strategy; TFLR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BRLN | TFLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $569M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 6.51% | 6.85% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.0% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.4% | +8.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.03% | 1.98% |
| Max drawdown | -3.85% | -4.01% |
Similar to BRLN and TFLR
Explore further