Screener
BSR vs SPDF
Pacific Select Fund vs Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF
Key differences
- SPDF costs 0.40% less per year.
- BSR is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BSR is classified as mixed asset, while SPDF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| BSR | SPDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.09% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $5M |
| Since | 2023 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.71% | — |
| Max drawdown | -15.68% | -1.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BSR and SPDF
Explore further