Screener
SPDF vs BTR
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs Beacon Tactical Risk ETF
Key differences
- SPDF costs 0.39% less per year.
- BTR is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDF is classified as equity, while BTR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | BTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $37M |
| Since | 2026 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.19% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.77% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -16.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and BTR
Explore further