Screener
BSR vs TUG
Pacific Select Fund vs STF Tactical Growth ETF
Key differences
- TUG costs 0.44% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, TUG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BSR | TUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.09% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $42M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.71% | 16.15% |
| Max drawdown | -15.68% | -22.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BSR and TUG
Explore further