Screener
BSR vs TUGN
Pacific Select Fund vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 0.44% less per year.
- BSR is classified as mixed asset, while TUGN is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BSR follows a active selection strategy; TUGN uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, TUGN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BSR | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.09% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $78M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | 11.46% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | +35.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.71% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -15.68% | -23.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BSR and TUGN
Explore further