Screener
BTR vs ONOF
Beacon Tactical Risk ETF vs Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF
Key differences
- ONOF costs 0.69% less per year.
- ONOF is significantly larger than BTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ONOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BTR | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.08% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $148M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | 1.35% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | +14.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.77% | 11.43% |
| Max drawdown | -16.67% | -26.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BTR and ONOF
Explore further