Screener
ONOF vs BSR
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF vs Pacific Select Fund
Key differences
- ONOF costs 0.70% less per year.
- ONOF is significantly larger than BSR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ONOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ONOF | BSR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 1.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $148M | $39M |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.35% | 1.02% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.43% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -26.21% | -15.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ONOF and BSR
Explore further