Screener
BTR vs RHTX
Beacon Tactical Risk ETF vs RH Tactical Outlook ETF
Key differences
- BTR costs 0.43% less per year.
- BTR is significantly larger than RHTX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RHTX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RHTX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BTR | RHTX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.08% | 1.51% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $9M |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.77% | 15.10% |
| Max drawdown | -16.67% | -24.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BTR and RHTX
Explore further