Screener
RHTX vs BDGS
RH Tactical Outlook ETF vs Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Key differences
- BDGS costs 0.64% less per year.
- BDGS is significantly larger than RHTX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RHTX is classified as mixed asset, while BDGS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RHTX covers global markets; BDGS covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, RHTX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RHTX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RHTX | BDGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.51% | 0.87% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $42M |
| Since | 2012 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.53% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | +14.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.12% | 6.06% |
| Max drawdown | -24.68% | -9.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RHTX and BDGS
Explore further