Screener
BUFM vs LRGC
AB Moderate Buffer ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Key differences
- LRGC costs 0.30% less per year.
- BUFM is classified as alternative, while LRGC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BUFM follows a structured outcome strategy; LRGC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BUFM | LRGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $397M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.3% | +25.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.84% | 12.03% |
| Max drawdown | -9.43% | -19.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BUFM and LRGC
Explore further