Screener
BUFM vs QMAG
AB Moderate Buffer ETF vs FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - August
Key differences
- BUFM costs 0.21% less per year.
- BUFM is significantly larger than QMAG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BUFM | QMAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $397M | $63M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.3% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.84% | 7.31% |
| Max drawdown | -9.43% | -12.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BUFM and QMAG
Explore further