Screener
QMAG vs BUFQ
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - August vs FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF
Key differences
- QMAG costs 0.10% less per year.
- BUFQ is significantly larger than QMAG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| QMAG | BUFQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $63M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.9% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.31% | 8.50% |
| Max drawdown | -12.44% | -15.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QMAG and BUFQ
Explore further