Skip to content
Screener

BUFQ vs BUFH

FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF vs FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF

BUFQ

FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF

Annual cost

1.00%

Fund size

$1.5B

BUFH

FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$54M

Key differences

Both BUFQ and BUFH are alternative ETFs. BUFQ charges 1.00% a year and BUFH 0.95%. The main difference: BUFH costs 0.05% less per year.

  • BUFH costs 0.05% less per year.
  • BUFQ is much larger than BUFH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

BUFQBUFH
Annual cost (TER)1.00%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$1.5B$54M
Since20222025
Dividend yield0.00%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategystructured outcomestructured outcome
CAGR 1Y+18.9%N/A
CAGR 3Y+16.3%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.10N/A
Volatility 1Y8.38%
Max drawdown-15.74%-1.53%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BUFQ and BUFH