Skip to content
Screener

BUFQ vs BUFR

FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF vs FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF

BUFQ

FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF

Annual cost

1.00%

Fund size

$1.5B

BUFR

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$9.6B

Key differences

Both BUFQ and BUFR are alternative ETFs. BUFQ charges 1.00% a year and BUFR 0.95%. The main difference: BUFR costs 0.05% less per year.

  • BUFR costs 0.05% less per year.
  • BUFR is much larger than BUFQ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, BUFQ has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

BUFQBUFR
Annual cost (TER)1.00%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$1.5B$9.6B
Since20222020
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategystructured outcomestructured outcome
CAGR 1Y+18.9%+15.3%
CAGR 3Y+16.3%+13.9%
CAGR 5YN/A+9.7%
Sharpe 3Y1.101.11
Volatility 1Y8.38%6.61%
Max drawdown-15.74%-13.73%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BUFQ and BUFR