Skip to content
Screener

BUFR vs BUFQ

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF vs FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF

BUFR

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$9.6B

BUFQ

FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF

Annual cost

1.00%

Fund size

$1.5B

Key differences

Both BUFR and BUFQ are alternative ETFs. BUFR charges 0.95% a year and BUFQ 1.00%. The main difference: BUFR costs 0.05% less per year.

  • BUFR costs 0.05% less per year.
  • BUFR is much larger than BUFQ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, BUFQ has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

BUFRBUFQ
Annual cost (TER)0.95%1.00%
Fund size (AUM)$9.6B$1.5B
Since20202022
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategystructured outcomestructured outcome
CAGR 1Y+15.3%+18.9%
CAGR 3Y+13.9%+16.3%
CAGR 5Y+9.7%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.111.10
Volatility 1Y6.61%8.38%
Max drawdown-13.73%-15.74%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BUFR and BUFQ