Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BUSA vs IWD

Brandes U.S. Value ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

BUSA

Brandes U.S. Value ETF

Brandes

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$292M

IWD

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$74.3B

Key differences

  • IWD costs 0.42% less per year.
  • IWD is significantly larger than BUSA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • BUSA follows a active selection strategy; IWD uses index tracking.
  • IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BUSAIWD
Annual cost (TER)0.60%0.18%
Fund size (AUM)$292M$74.3B
Since20232000
Dividend yield1.48%1.55%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+23.9%+28.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+18.3%
CAGR 5YN/A+10.1%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.09
Volatility 1Y11.96%10.88%
Max drawdown-14.19%-38.51%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BUSA and IWD