Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BUZZ vs HAP

VanEck Social Sentiment ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF

BUZZ

VanEck Social Sentiment ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.76%

Fund size

$100M

HAP

VanEck Natural Resources ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.41%

Fund size

$316M

Key differences

  • HAP costs 0.35% less per year.
  • HAP is significantly larger than BUZZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • BUZZ covers north america markets; HAP covers global.
  • Over the last 3 years, BUZZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BUZZHAP
Annual cost (TER)0.76%0.41%
Fund size (AUM)$100M$316M
Since20212008
Dividend yield0.00%1.86%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaglobal
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+42.3%+47.8%
CAGR 3Y+37.5%+18.4%
CAGR 5Y+10.5%+11.3%
Sharpe 3Y1.090.92
Volatility 1Y31.21%14.91%
Max drawdown-56.87%-44.14%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BUZZ and HAP